|
1.
|
|
Aims and Scope
|
|
1.1
|
|
Indian Journal of Agronomy
welcomes concise
articles presenting original research data based on field experiments on all
aspects of Agronomy in different field crops and related cropping systems.
|
|
1.2
|
|
The journal publishes only full length
comprehensive articles based on new approaches/findings in English only.
|
|
1.3
|
|
Review articles are also considered but these
are normally solicited by Editorial Board. However, the author(s) who wish to
contribute a review on their own based on their standing in the relevant
field may contact the Secretary or Chief Editor with a broad outline before
submitting the manuscript. Manuscripts submitted without following above
procedure will be summarily rejected
|
|
1.4
|
|
The articles submitted for publication in the
journal should contain data not older than 5 years on the date of receipt of
article in the Society office. The period shall be reckoned from the
following 31 December and 31 July after the completion of the field
experimentation for summer & rainy (kharif) and for winter (rabi) &
spring seasons, respectively.
|
|
1.5
|
|
The articles submitted for publication should
be exclusive for this journal and must not be submitted elsewhere during
their consideration by the journal. These must not carry any material already
published in the same or different form.
|
|
1.6
|
|
The article should present a complete picture
of the investigation made and should not be split into parts. However, in
exceptional cases where a large volume of in-depth data are collected based
on multi-season experimentation, the article can be split into a maximum of two parts, with the same main
title and a different subtitle in short. In such articles, proper continuity
should be maintained in presentation of information, and all these articles
should be submitted together at the same time.
|
|
1.7
|
|
Each article should be written in
correctly, clearly, objectively and concisely. All the statements made in the
manuscript should be clear, unambiguous, and to the point. Aim at short,
meaningful sentences while maintaining continuity of expression.
|
|
1.8
|
|
There is no prescribed limit regarding the
number of pages in case of full-length article, the completeness of the
information is more important. However, the length of article should not be
less than 3 full printed pages of the journal.
|
|
1.9
|
|
Articles should be suitably divided into the
following sub-sections: ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS, and REFERENCES. Tables and figures
should be appended separately at the end. The headings INTRODUCTION and
CONCLUSION need not be mentioned in the text.
|
|
2.
|
|
Title page (Separate)
|
|
2.1
|
|
Title of article should be informative but
concise, and should not contain abbreviations. It should indicate the content
of the article essential for key word indexing and information retrieval. It
should be set in small and bold letters, using one font size higher than the
remaining text.
|
|
2.2
|
|
Start the title with key words – not with
words such as ‘Effect of ….’ or ‘Influence of …..’.
A good title briefly identifies the subject, indicates the purpose of study
and introduces key terms and concepts.
|
|
2.3
|
|
The title should indicate the scientific name
of the crops or organisms studied, wherever relevant. Authority for such a
name need not be given in the title but should be given at first mention in
the text.
|
|
2.4
|
|
A short title, not exceeding 6 words or 50
characters, should be given for running headlines. This should cover the main
theme of the article.
|
|
2.5
|
|
Byline should contain, in addition to the
names and initials of authors (in capital letters), the place where research
was conducted (in italics), and not where the authors are currently working.
Change of address for any author should be given as a footnote. Complete
address including the name of laboratory / department, institution /
university, city / town / district, state and PIN code should be furnished.
|
|
2.6
|
|
Email ID of the corresponding author should be
given as footnote. It is a must for all articles that will be submitted from
now onwards.
|
|
3.
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
|
3.1
|
|
Second page should start with title of the
article and is to be followed by the abstract.
Abstract placed at the beginning of the text
should briefly indicate the experiment described, including brief objective
(not the wording of the title as such), season or year and the place of study
as appropriate, materials and methods, main results (preferably including
some numerical values) and the most important conclusion/recommendation.
|
|
3.2
|
|
It should comprise brief and factual summary
of salient points of the contents and conclusions of the investigation
reported in the article and should refer to any new information therein.
|
|
3.3
|
|
At the first mention in the abstract, give the
complete scientific name for plants and other organisms, full name of any
abbreviation or symbol used.
|
|
3.4
|
|
It should not have reference to literature and
tables/figures. Do not deflect the reader with promises such as ‘will be
discussed’ or ‘will be explained’.
|
|
3.5
|
|
It should be as concise as possible and
limited to about 200 words.
|
|
3.6
|
|
Key words (6-8) should be given at the end of
Abstract in alphabetical order (each key word to start with capital letter), separated by commas. These words
indicate the most important materials, operations or ideas covered in the
article.
|
|
3.7
|
|
It must be remembered that indexing journals
place a great emphasis on the abstract in the selection of articles for
abstracting. If properly prepared, they reproduce it verbatim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
4.1
|
|
The introductory part should be brief and to
the point, limited to the statement of the problem that justifies the work or
the hypothesis on which it is based, an explanation
of the general approach and objectives of the study.
|
|
4.2
|
|
It should set the work in present context,
giving only essential background; a detailed review of literature is not
necessary. However, to orient the readers, give a brief reference to previous
concepts and research.
|
|
4.3
|
|
It should briefly state the currently
available information on the subject, duly supported by recent and relevant
literature, and identify the research gap that is expected to be bridged
through this investigation.
|
|
4.4
|
|
When new references are available, do not use
old references unless it is of historical importance or a landmark in that field.
|
|
4.5
|
|
Emphasis should be given among other things on
citing the literature on work done under Indian conditions.
|
|
4.6
|
|
If the methods employed in the article are
new, it must be indicated in the introduction section.
|
|
4.7
|
|
The word heading ‘Introduction’ should not be
typed as a heading but the beginning of the main text may be indicated by
putting a short line below the abstract in the middle of the page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|
5.1
|
|
This part of the article should comprise the
materials used in the investigation, methods of experiment and analysis
adopted. It should be explanatory and have all the requisite information
needed for understanding and assessing the results reported subsequently.
|
|
5.2
|
|
This part should begin with information
relating to period/season/year and place of study, climate or weather
conditions, soil type including physico-chemical
properties and others as relevant to the study. The geographical position of
the experimental site may be identified with the help of coordinates
(latitude and longitude) and altitude.
|
|
5.3
|
|
Treatment details along with techniques and
experimental design, replications, plot size etc. should be clearly indicated.
It should be doubly ensured that experiment was conducted in such a way that
minimum error degrees of freedom are there. Whenever data are pooled, year x
treatment interaction effects must be clearly given. Pooling of data must be
avoided in dryland; rainfed
experiments and fixed site experiments for entire period of experimentation.
If asked, the authors must be able to give the homogeneity of error variance.
|
|
5.4
|
|
Use of symbols for
treatments may be avoided, unless these are absolutely necessary. An
abbreviation should be fully explained at its first mention.
|
|
5.5
|
|
This section should also specify the crop
variety (within single inverted commas), methodology for application of
treatments, common cultivation practices including sowing, fertilization,
weed management, irrigation, plant protection measures, harvest etc.
For cropping system experiments, it should be
clearly stated that whether the study was carried out on fixed location for
the experimental period or site is changed every year. In rainfed
and dryland experiments, initial moisture status at
sowing (or at different stages), rainfall distribution and evaporation (as a
graph) should be given. If the treatments are based on moisture conservation
practices (summer ploughing, manures, mulching,
land configuration etc.), moisture conserved, extraction and utilization (efficiency)
data must be given. In irrigation studies (based IW/CPE ratio)
daily evaporation and rainfall data in the form of a graph along with the
dates of irrigation mentioned year wise in the text is necessary.
The nutrient composition of manures (N, P, K, Fe, Zn, organic carbon content)
should be given. For new herbicides, mode of action should be clearly
stated.
|
|
5.6
|
|
A brief description of the specific
observations recorded may also be made. Further, the procedure for
calculation of not-so-common parameters should be explained along with
suitable references.
|
|
5.7
|
|
Known methods of analysis may be just
indicated, avoiding detailed description. However, any new technique
developed and followed should be described in detail.
|
|
5.8
|
|
References for methods used in the study
should be cited. If the techniques are widely familiar such as those of
chemical and statistical analysis, use only their names in that case.
|
|
5.9
|
|
All statistical comparisons among treatments
may be made at P=0.05 level of probability. Correlation and regression
analysis should be given in appropriate cases. For working out optimum
economic doses, control treatment is a must in the experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
|
|
6.1
|
|
Results may be reported and discussed together
to avoid duplication. The information should be divided into suitable
subheadings, indicated in italics.
|
|
6.2
|
|
This section should not be mere recital of the
data presented in the tables and diagrams in terms of increases and
decreases. Do not mention the data as such in the text, which can be seen
from the tables. Instead interpret it suitably by indicating in terms of per cent
/ absolute changes or any other derivations.
|
|
6.3
|
|
While discussing the results, give particular
attention to the problem, question or hypothesis presented in the
introduction. Relate results to the objectives.
|
|
6.4
|
|
Explain the principles, relationships and
generalizations that can be supported by the results.
|
|
6.5
|
|
In factorial experiments, interaction effects
need greater emphasis. Much emphasis need not be paid to less important
parameters.
|
|
6.6
|
|
Discussion should be strengthened by
explaining treatment effects in terms of cause-and-effect relationship.
Explain how the results relate to previous findings (supports or
contradicts the previous findings).
|
|
6.7
|
|
Scientific speculation is encouraged but, it
should be reasonable and firmly founded in observations. When the results
differ from previously available information, possible explanations should be
given. Controversial issues should be discussed clearly and fairly.
|
|
6.8
|
|
The references quoted in the introduction for
review and justification of the study should be suitably utilized for
discussion of the results.
|
|
6.9
|
|
Discussion part in most articles in very weak.
Statements like “The results are in agreement with ……”, ‘Similar results were
reported by ……..’ are to be avoided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
Conclusions
|
|
7.1
|
|
This section should clearly crystallize the
summary of the results obtained along with their implications in solution of
the practical problems and contribution to the advancement of scientific
knowledge.
|
|
7.2
|
|
Suggest areas for further investigation.
|
|
7.3
|
|
The word ‘Conclusions’ need not be typed as a
heading and may be given as a last paragraph of the ‘Results and Discussion’.
In no case, it should not be more than 5 sentences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
|
8.1
|
|
The authors may place on record the help and
cooperation or any financial help received from any source, person or
organization for this study. This should be very brief, and can be omitted if
necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
References
|
|
9.1
|
|
In general, not more than 10
references would be required.
|
|
9.2
|
|
There is no need to give references for
standard procedures of soil and plant analysis, as well as for routine
statistical analysis; only the methodology may be indicated.
|
|
9.3
|
|
All references quoted in the text must appear
at the end of the article and vice-versa. The spellings of names and dates or
years at the two places should be carefully checked.
|
|
9.4
|
|
The references should include names of all
authors, years (not within brackets), full title of the article, full name of
the journal (in italics) (no abbreviations), volume number (in bold), issue
number, and pages. For book or monograph, the name of the publisher should
also be given as well as its volume, edition and relevant pages.
|
|
9.5
|
|
The references cited together in the text
should be arranged chronologically. The list of references should be arranged
alphabetically on author’s names, and chronologically per author.
|
|
9.6
|
|
References from standard scientific journals
should be preferred, while those concerning unpublished data are generally to
be avoided or mentioned as ‘Personal communications’ in the text. These need
not be given in the reference list.
|
|
A few examples for correct citation of references
in the list are given below:
|
|
|
|
9.6.1.
|
|
Extended summaries
|
|
|
|
Pandey, J. 2002. Direct and
residual effect of herbicides on weeds and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. In: Extended
Summaries, Second International Agronomy Congress, 26-30 November 2002, New Delhi. pp.1166-1167.
|
|
9.6.2.
|
|
Proceedings
|
|
|
|
Ladha, J.K.2004. Managing N
for crop productivity and environmental quality. In: Proceedings of Second International Agronomy Congress on Balancing
Food and Environmental Security: A Continuing Challenge. Singh, Panjab, Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gautam, R.C. (Eds.). Indian Society of Agronomy, Indian
Agricultural Research Institute, New
Delhi. pp. 44-45.
|
|
9.6.3.
|
|
Abstracts
|
|
|
|
Vairavan, K.2009. Effect of
pre and post emergence herbicide in pigeon pea. In: Abstracts, International Conference on Grain Legumes: Quality
Improvement, Value Addition and Trade, 14-16 Februaruy,
2009, Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, Indian Institute of
Pulses Research, Kanpur.
pp.178.
|
|
9.6.4.
|
|
Annual
report:
|
|
|
|
IARI. 2007. Integrated nutrient supply and
management in pearlmillet-mustard cropping system.
Annual Report, 2007-08. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. p. 60.
|
|
9.6.5.
|
|
Research
articles
|
|
|
|
Joshi, N.L. 1999. Effect of component
densities on the performance of pearlmillet-mungbean
intercropping system under different rainfall situations in an arid
environment. Annals of Arid Zone 38: 15-25.
|
|
|
|
Sharma, S. N. and
Prasad, Rajendra. 2008. Effect
of crop-residue management on the production and agronomic nitrogen
efficiency in a rice-wheat cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 171 (2): 295-302.
|
|
|
|
Singh, Devendra., Pandey, Rakesh.,
Sharma, S.K. and Kumar, Vipin. 2008. Effect of crop
geometry and planting methods on growth and yield of Bt and non-Bt cotton
hybrids in cotton-wheat system under northwestern plain zones. Journal of Farming Systems Research and
Development 14 (1): 46-49.
|
|
9.6.6.
|
|
Book
|
|
|
|
Kumar, D. and Singh, N.B. (Eds).
2004. Cowpea in India. 281 pp. Scientific
Publishers, Jodhpur.
|
|
9.6.7.
|
|
Book
chapter
|
|
|
|
Sekhon, H.S. and Singh, G.
2007. Irrigation management in chickpea. In: Chickpea Breeding and Management. (Yadav, S.S., Redden, R.R., Chen, W. and Sharma, B. Eds.). pp.246-267 , CABI, Wallingford, UK.
|
|
9.6.8.
|
|
Thesis
|
|
|
|
Singh, Ramanjeet.2008. ‘Effect of nitrogen management through
organic and inorganic sources in sole and intercropped Bt cotton– wheat
system’. Ph.D. Thesis, Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research
Institute, New Delhi, India. pp.99+xi
|
|
10.
|
|
Tables 3
|
|
10.1
|
|
Each table must be typed on a separate sheet
(not to be included in the text) and numbered consecutively in the same order
as they are mentioned in text.
|
|
10.2
|
|
The title should fully describe the contents
of the table and explain any symbol or abbreviation used in it as a footnote,
using asterisks or small letters viz. a, b, etc.
|
|
10.3
|
|
Tables should be self-explanatory, not very
large (< 10 columns in portrait and <14 columns in land scape formats respectively) and may cover space up to
20-25% of the text.
|
|
10.4
|
|
Maximum size of table acceptable is that can
be conveniently composed within one full printed page of the journal. The
large sized tables should be suitably split into two or more small tables.
|
|
10.5
|
|
Standard abbreviations of units of different
parameters should be added between parentheses.
|
|
10.6
|
|
The data in the tables should be corrected to
minimum place of decimal so as to make it more meaningful.
|
|
10.7
|
|
Vertical lines should not be used to separate
columns. Similarly, horizontal lines should be used only where these are
necessary, not in the body of the article.
|
|
10.8
|
|
All the tables should be tagged with the main
body of the text i.e. after references.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
|
Figures
|
|
11.1
|
|
Figures may be given in place of tables where
a large number of values are presented that can be interpreted through
figures. In no case the same data should be presented in both tables and
figures.
|
|
11.2
|
|
Originals of the figures should be no larger
than twice the final size, of good quality and printed clearly in black on
plain white paper (not in colour). The figures may
be sized to fit within the columns of the journal (8 cm width for single
column or 17 cm for columns i.e. full page).
|
|
11.3
|
|
Lines should be bold enough to allow the
figure to be reduced to either single or double column width in the journal.
|
|
11.4
|
|
Vertical axes should be labelled
vertically. Extremely small font and great variation in text sizes within
figures should be avoided. The aim should be that on printing the words and
figures, including caption, come to 9 pt type size.
|
|
11.5
|
|
Laser print outs of line diagrams are acceptable, while dot matrix print outs will be rejected. If required the authors will be asked to
submit soft copy of diagrams of accepted articles for final print in journal.
|
|
11.6
|
|
Black and white photographs are also accepted
if these are necessary to improve the presentation and quality of the
article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
|
Some Useful
Hints
|
|
12.1
|
|
All scientific or technical names as well as
all data and facts must be rechecked carefully before submitting the
manuscript.
|
|
12.2
|
|
Dates and years may be mentioned as 28 May
2007, 28 May to 7 June, and 28-30 May instead of May 28, 2007, 28 May-7 June,
and 28 to 30 May, respectively.
|
|
12.3
|
|
Avoid numerals and abbreviations at the
beginning of a sentence; spell out or change the word order if necessary.
|
|
12.4
|
|
A comma may be used for data in thousands or
more such as 10,000 or 2,30,000 etc. Alternatively,
these data can also be presented as 10.0 or 230.0 if a common expression such
as ‘ x103’ is used in tables or figures.
Avoid expressing data in ‘lakhs’,
instead use ‘thousand’ or ‘million’.
|
|
12.5
|
|
Only standard abbreviations should be used and
these should invariably be explained at first mention. Avoid use of self-made
abbreviations such as Rhizo., Azo., buta,
isop. etc. for Rhizobium, Azotobacter,
butachlor, isoproturon,
respectively.
|
|
12.6
|
|
For names of plant protection chemicals, the
first letter of the name need not be capitalized for scientific names but
should be capitalized for trade names. All the names should be checked very
carefully.
|
|
12.7
|
|
Use of unnecessary abbreviations and treatment
symbols such as T1, T2 etc. under Materials and Methods or tables without
actually using these under Results and Discussion should be avoided.
|
|
12.8
|
|
All weights and measurements must be in SI or
metric units. Use kg/ha, or t/ha (if more than 999 kg/ha), but not q/ha.
Similarly, prefer use of g/ha, mg/kg, mg/l, mg/g, ml/l etc. rather than % or ppm. Do not follow the style kg ha-1 or t ha-1.
|
|
12.9
|
|
Use % after numbers, not per-cent, e.g. 7%. In
a series or range of measurements, mention the units only at end, e.g. use
30, 100, 170 and 300C; 20 or 30% more instead of 30C, 100C, 170C and 300° C;
20% or 30% more.
|
|
12.10
|
|
Numeral should be used whenever it is followed
by a unit measure or its abbreviations e.g. 1 g, 3 m, 5 h, 6 months etc.
Otherwise, words should be used for numbers one to nine,
and numerals for larger ones except in a series of numbers when numerals
should be used for all in the series.
|
|
12.11
|
|
For the composition of fertilizers, manures,
crops or soil, the elemental forms (K, P, Mg etc.) should be used and not the
oxides.
|
|
12.12
|
|
Application rates of fertilizer nutrients
should not be mentioned in proportion such as: N : P2O5
: K2O 120 : 60 : 40 kg/ha. It can be given as 120 - 25 - 27 kg
N-P-K/ha.
|
|
12.13
|
|
Variety may be mentioned within single quotes
such as ‘Pusa Basmati’, ‘Pusa
Vishal’ etc.
|
|
12.14
|
|
Statistical analysis of data in the standard
experimental design should be sound and complete in itself with both SEm± and CD (P=0.05) values given for comparison of
treatment means in tables and figures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
Review Process
|
|
|
|
All the articles received for publication in Indian
Journal of Agronomy at
the end of the month are given an identification
number. All these articles are initially screened by the chief editor solely
or with the help of secretary and members of Editorial Board. If the article
is found to be in order as per the ‘Guidelines’ and there is adequate
original information, it is sent to an expert for peer review. On the
contrary, the articles that are weak or are not conforming
to ‘Guidelines’ are rejected as such or returned to the author for revision.
After the article has been examined by the reviewer, it is also suitably
edited by a member of Editorial Board. Both the reviewer and editorial board
comments along with the manuscript
are passed on to authors, who after attending the suggestions resubmits it.
The thoroughly revised article will be checked by editorial board and will be
placed before Chief Editor for a final decision. The articles accepted for
publication by Chief Editor are checked by a professional editor for english language, uniformity and any other ambiguity
before sending to the press for composing. Proofs are mailed to the
corresponding author and are also gone through by the professional editor/member
of Editorial board. The Society does not levy printing charges from the
authors of articles in Indian Journal of Agronomy,
and no reprints are supplied with or without payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|